In this article, we explore five common pitfalls

[RufaidaKhatun]

That arise in prior art searches that can be used to invalidate a patent. By understanding these pitfalls, patent professionals can improve their search strategies, ensuring that they uncover the most relevant and compelling prior art to effectively challenge the validity of a patent. Table of Contents I) Over-reliance on 102(b) Previous Article In the Blind Trust in Database Filters III) Line Drawing on the Critical Date Iv) Fixed Standard of “Broadest Reasonable Interpretation”.


V) Focusing on Patent Literature Only Final Thoughts Talk to our Expert I) Over-reliance on 102(b) Previous Article Under U.S. Patent law, 102(b) prior art is often seen as a crucial resource for those challenging the belgium girl whatsapp number validity of a patent. This is because 102(b) addresses exceptions to the general 102(a) rule, which states that a person is entitled to a patent unless: The claimed invention was patented, in public use, for sale, reported in a printed publication.



or otherwise available to the public prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, OR The claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151 (which covers the issue of a patent on payment of a fee) or in a patent application/patent naming another inventor and effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.